The trading of leveraged products is very popular. However, it is often not easy to find a suitable provider. While you can rely on the pre-selection of online brokers when trading warrants, it is much more difficult to find the right provider from the large number of supposed specialist service providers when trading contracts for difference and currencies. Together with the intelligence portal Due Diligence Hub, we have developed a matrix that analyzes and evaluates industry representatives based on a quality criteria-based scoring model. In principle, this is a kind of checklist that addresses important questions relating to a business relationship.
The evaluation criteria are user-oriented. One key aspect is consumer protection. Ratings from review portals are less heavily weighted. Quality assurance is rarely carried out here to filter out fake content. There are also often conflicts of interest, as business models are financed by fees. The same applies to industry awards. Here, the impression is often given that there are independent jury criteria that apply equally to all evaluated companies.
This tool is part of the ayondo Lab and is currently in the beta phase. The further development takes into account feedback from the community. Feel free to check back from time to time and, if you wish, you can send us your suggestions and wishes for improving the information content and usability. If you feel that certain facts play an important role in the selection of a financial service provider that you miss here in terms of content, we would be pleased if you let us know.
You have the possibility to make a preselection via the three options. The presentation of the facts is not always formulated as a question. A 'Yes' can have the meaning of 'applicable' or 'known', a 'No' can have the meaning of 'inapplicable' or 'unknown'.